court held that the right to health of citizens protected by law, the earthquake process, the plaintiff is the emergency, so he ran downstairs Shun Building, East stairs, when to run to the third floor to the second floor of the between the device layer, because the device layer of identity is not clear miscarriage of justice resulting in the plaintiff injured jumping off a building, and the resulting economic losses. On the fifth floor to the first floor of the safe passage really smooth case,mbt scarpe, the consequences of the damage occurred, the plaintiff misjudgment and wrong way to take the emergency is the main reason that the defendant did not clearly identify certain factors. Plaintiff, the defendant should bear the consequences of secondary injury liability, the plaintiff should bear the primary responsibility. Plaintiff claims loss of working time, care, transport accommodation, because there was no direct evidence, not support it.

reporter Denghong Yang

accordingly the court verdict, the defendant in the decision within ten days from the date of entry into force of the plaintiff compensation for medical expenses Hwang, disability living allowance, hospital food subsidies,donna mbt, disability compensation, fees of five forensic 16 million yuan of economic losses amounting to 20%, a section of 3.3 million yuan.

the plaintiff in the trial, said Hwang, an earthquake occurs,mbt outlet, he is living in the defendant's 507 rooms. Felt the earthquake, he quickly transferred to the downstairs, when to run to the middle of the second and third floor corner stairs, and found the second floor exits blocked, so he jump from the window on the second floor platform, resulting in skull fractures. After the accident,uomo mbt, he suffered a huge economic and spiritual loss.

Wucheng Long told reporters that the judge, the court has organized the two sides on compensation issues for mediation, but that the defendant without any fault of their own, refused to mediate, the court shall first instance verdict on the case.

but building an agent that exits the building is open, the plaintiff in the panic of the device layer between the second and third floor as a safety exit door, their own misconceptions, coupled with has taken the wrong way to escape is mainly caused by a fall. Therefore, without any fault of party building, should not bear the responsibility.

The agents also asked the plaintiff: people also said that the experiences of building party sympathetic to the plaintiff, not only in time to send him to the hospital for treatment, also launched its fund-raising staff building, donated 10,050 yuan was raised in his treatment.

fracture, causing eight injuries. Later, Hwang sued the building Zhengzhou City People's Court, claims for medical expenses, lost income, fees, a total of 20 million yuan. Recently, the Court of First Instance ruling that the plaintiff is the main reason of improper means of escape, should bear the primary responsibility.

Huang said, the stairs inside the darkened building is unclear, the device layer of the so-called time of the incident and no signs, people familiar with the situation only to find exit. He believes that poor building management,mbt prezzi, to find safe when an earthquake occurs when exporting the wrong impression, it should bear responsibility.

jumped to escape controversy

primary responsibility for the error escape

相关的主题文章：

• the family enjoyable.
• the three work too hard and not pay to spend
• the plant has three to four years